Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humanist Fellowship of Montreal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Putting this out of its misery after four relistings. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Humanist Fellowship of Montreal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for 5 years; couldn't establish notability Boleyn (talk) 10:53, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:28, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article does not establish notability. Possibly redirect to Humanist Canada, as it appears to have been a precursor of sorts. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 04:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – There's an article about the group in The Gazette from 1968 which I've added as a source, and the group is discussed extensively in the book Morgentaler: a difficult hero : a biography by Catherine Dunphy, Random House of Canada, 1996 (which, as a sidenote, was nominated for a Governor General's Award). Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:45, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 00:14, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 10:47, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This coverage isn't sufficient to establish notability - the newspaper article in particular mentions the organisation along with several others only as a side comment on a bigger article on humanism - and is also on the 'local news' page - I think Morgentaler may be notable, but this organisation just hasn't had the same level of exposure in national media etc ---- _nonsense ferret 15:21, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 04:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.